CO129-033 - General Stavely - Lieut. Governor - 1850 [5-8] — Page 184

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

3. Neither is the opinion you express at the close of your despatch with reference to the disposal of offenders, not being British Subjects, of small magnitude, deserving serious consideration. It would be desirable to leave the offences committed by Chinese against their fellow countrymen to be dealt with as much as possible by their national tribunals, but before adopting the policy you recommend, it would, I conceive, be highly necessary, considering the great importance of the question, to have some clear understanding as to the principle upon which cases to be dealt with by our own tribunals should be distinguished from those to be handed over to the Chinese authorities.

4. As far as I understand the evidence transmitted with your despatch, it seems that the vessel in question sailed from a British port with the object of encouraging Government by the repression of Piracy, and that one of the considerations which weighed with her owners was the probability that the ports of Malacca, Singapore, and Penang (now important ones) would derive benefit therefrom.

4. That the course to be pursued should be clearly defined appears to be the more necessary, as appears from the statement enclosed in your despatch that one of the deponents stated that although the vessel sailed from a foreign port, one Teong ... (while others ...


...人...

Page 41

...

Edit History

2026-05-17 16:49:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
3. Neither is the opinion you express at the close of your despatch with reference to the disposal of offenders, not being British Subjects, of small magnitude, deserving serious consideration. It would be desirable to leave the offences committed by Chinese against their fellow countrymen to be dealt with as much as possible by their national tribunals, but before adopting the policy you recommend, it would, I conceive, be highly necessary, considering the great importance of the question, to have some clear understanding as to the principle upon which cases to be dealt with by our own tribunals should be distinguished from those to be handed over to the Chinese authorities. 4. As far as I understand the evidence transmitted with your despatch, it seems that the vessel in question sailed from a British port with the object of encouraging Government by the repression of Piracy, and that one of the considerations which weighed with her owners was the probability that the ports of Malacca, Singapore, and Penang (now important ones) would derive benefit therefrom. 4. That the course to be pursued should be clearly defined appears to be the more necessary, as appears from the statement enclosed in your despatch that one of the deponents stated that although the vessel sailed from a foreign port, one Teong ... (while others ... ...人... Page 41 ...
Baseline (Original)
3. Ne which is the opinion, you express at the close of your ales path with reference to the et'sposal of offenders, not being British Subjects, ragnitude, diesel zeren usorting to Hong Honey join a quation of Startervily would de desevible to leave the offeures committed by Chinese against their follow Countrymuar to be chath with as much as possible by their national Tretinals, but before adopting the policy you Recommend, it would I concein be highly necessary, considering the de quch micportance compel consideration. It 4 As far 41 1 understand the Evidence transmithed with jour dush. it seems that the vesel in question sailed home a Brition port 179 of encouraging Coverment by the repression of Pivacy, to have some clear under. as to the Primisel which the standing eri cases to be bath with by our own Futurals should be distinguished frome there to be handed over to the Chinese buthorities 4. That the course of be pescuding should clearly abfined appers to be the more mumpary, as Sobsene from the (the 199me to Lantented enclores in atottaler & wished her your in the cas despatch that one of others : (Malacce, sincopore now importul one & Denary are mentioned) the deponents states this although trund allemmaliz the Sepel sailed from for Choise port. One Tenong, enthile while other
2026-05-17 16:49:37 · Baseline
View content

3. Ne

which

is the opinion, you express at the close of your ales path with reference to the et'sposal of offenders, not being British Subjects,

ragnitude, diesel zeren

usorting to Hong Honey join a quation of Startervily would de

desevible to leave the

offeures committed

by

Chinese against their follow Countrymuar to be

chath with as much as

possible by their national Tretinals, but before

adopting the policy you

Recommend,

it would

I concein be highly necessary, considering

the

de quch micportance

compel consideration. It

4 As far

41

1

understand the Evidence

transmithed with

jour

dush. it seems that the vesel in

question sailed

home a Brition port

179

of encouraging Coverment by the repression of Pivacy,

to have some clear under.

as to the Primisel

which the

standing

eri

cases to be bath with

by

our own Futurals should be distinguished frome

there to be handed over to the Chinese buthorities

4. That the course of

be

pescuding should clearly abfined appers to be the more mumpary,

as Sobsene from the

(the 199me to Lantented enclores in

atottaler & wished her

your

in the cas

despatch that one of

others : (Malacce, sincopore now importul one

& Denary are mentioned) the deponents states this

although trund allemmaliz

the

Sepel sailed from for Choise port. One Tenong, enthile

while other

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.